9.9 KiB
DGR-001 — Safetensors versus GGUF performance contract
Status: complete; immutable v1 verdict is stop.
DGR-001 successfully produced a controlled local-real CPU baseline. Completion means the experiment and decision contract are durable and verified; it does not mean the native GGUF track is approved to continue. The locked quality gate failed, so dependent runtime work requires a human decision or a new, explicitly versioned experiment/contract rather than silently weakening v1.
Controlled workload
- Model:
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct - Exact source revision:
7ae557604adf67be50417f59c2c2f167def9a775 - Machine:
fedora, Linux7.0.14-101.fc43.x86_64, 32 logical CPUs - Device: CPU for every recipe; VRAM is therefore correctly reported as zero
- Runtime reference: Transformers
5.13.0, PyTorch2.10.0+rocm7.13.0a20260513, BF16 safetensors - GGUF runtime: llama.cpp version 9991, commit
e920c523e3b8a0163fe498af5bf90df35ff51d25 - Workload: three fixed short/medium/long prompts, greedy sampling, 32 output tokens, three repeats, two warmups, concurrency 1 and 4, 16 CPU threads
- Evidence class:
local-real
All artifacts are beneath /run/media/popov/DATA/llm/; no model artifact was
created under /home.
Recipes and exact artifacts
| Recipe | Artifact | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
| Transformers BF16 reference | complete mounted Hugging Face snapshot | e596e9d6205fdc9177569cccd7f8b471b058f66e3630c8e4326d5aad52bd18b6 |
| llama.cpp BF16 quality lane | Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-7ae5576-BF16.gguf |
e842fdc35d7f00fda95a54e1b51731ba1d196aea45065cc9f46925fdc1d6f862 |
| llama.cpp Q4_K_M performance/fit lane | Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-7ae5576-Q4_K_M.gguf |
a88e3f570e2efeaf06b50df9859db2c70d8646aa3a2c94a14e14d5797a2921a5 |
The snapshot digest covers every sorted relative path, resolved size, and file byte, so tokenizer/config drift is included. The BF16 GGUF was converted directly from the exact snapshot while preserving BF16 weights. Q4_K_M was quantized from an exact-revision F16 conversion with the pinned quantizer. Runtime validation recomputes every declared digest before model loading.
Real results
All recipes completed every request with zero failures.
| Metric | Transformers BF16 | llama.cpp BF16 | llama.cpp Q4_K_M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decode tok/s, c=1 | 40.8 | 98.5 | 207.7 |
| Aggregate decode tok/s, c=4 | 46.5 | 222.8 | 195.7 |
| TTFT p50, c=1 | 40.0 ms | 15.1 ms | 21.6 ms |
| Peak resident memory, c=1 | 1.94 GB | 1.11 GB | 0.54 GB |
| Artifact size | 1.00 GB | 0.99 GB | 0.40 GB |
| Failures | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Against the reference, the eligible Q4_K_M lane measured:
- single-request decode speedup: 5.10×;
- concurrency-4 aggregate throughput speedup: 4.20×;
- resident-memory ratio: 0.279×;
- artifact-size ratio: 0.398×.
The near-lossless BF16 quality lane compared all three prompts but measured:
- exact match: 0.3333 (v1 requires at least
0.90); - mean text similarity: 0.9471 (v1 requires at least
0.97).
Tokenization and stopping were controlled: every runtime saw the same prompt
token counts and reported 31 post-TTFT decode tokens. The v1 mismatch is a
real greedy-output divergence on two prompts, not missing coverage or a
text-length artifact. Its root cause remains undetermined; no post-contract
logit-tie claim is acceptance evidence. Therefore contract-evaluation.json
records:
verdict: stop
quality_lane_pass: false
speed_benefit: true
fit_benefit: true
stop_condition_met: true
Thresholds were not changed after observing these results.
Post-contract parity and ROCm diagnostics
summarize-quality-parity.py verifies and separates two signed sources. The CPU
v1 row uses CPU kernels and a Transformers BF16 oracle; it remains at 0.3333
exact match with an unexplained divergence. The ROCm row uses a different plan,
GPU kernels, and a Transformers float32 oracle. In that narrower diagnostic,
the same BF16 GGUF artifact matches all three 32-token sequences exactly (1.0
exact match and 1.0 similarity). No conversion corruption was observed in
that three-sequence ROCm sample; this does not prove global conversion
correctness or explain the CPU result.
A separate HIP build at commit e920c523 was compiled for gfx1151 and
measured ROCm0: Radeon 8060S Graphics; its llama-server SHA-256 is
b6bb4da687dbde86e243ba006cef05919b7b97255cd7e2371e1d451220aca139.
A signed gpu-diagnostic profile measured zero failures:
| GPU metric | Transformers BF16 ROCm | llama.cpp Q4 ROCm | Q4 ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decode tok/s, c=1 | 81.12 | 251.25 | 3.10× |
| Aggregate decode tok/s, c=4 | 91.24 | 511.33 | 5.60× |
| TTFT p50, c=1 | 13.77 ms | 11.80 ms | 0.857× |
The GPU report is signed under the distinct
run_configured_gpu_diagnostic/v1 producer. The v1 evaluator rejects that
producer even when its signature is valid. llama-server process VRAM remains
unmeasured, so this diagnostic cannot replace or satisfy the immutable v1
contract. Its signed backend detail records the measured ROCm0: Radeon 8060S Graphics device and 25/25 offloaded layers.
Implementation
recipe_benchmark.pyprovides the runtime-neutral measurement core, true concurrency, continuous in-flight peak-memory sampling, percentile/throughput aggregation, failures, and output drift.recipe_drivers.pyprovides opt-in Transformers and llama-server drivers, mounted-drive confinement, exact artifact/runtime verification, equal device/thread budgets, greedy-only validation, measured host provenance, a CPU-only v1 guard until process VRAM can be measured honestly, and a distinct signed GPU diagnostic profile that the v1 evaluator cannot accept.- Peak RSS is runtime-scoped: Transformers reports growth above its pre-runtime Python baseline, while llama.cpp reports its isolated server process tree. Both are sampled continuously during in-flight requests.
- TTFT uses each runtime's prompt/first-token compute boundary; end-to-end HTTP,
scheduling, and queue overhead remains in latency and
queue_wait_ms. - The exact canonical plan SHA-256 locks prompts, model/revision, sampling, output length, repeats, warmups, and concurrency. The evaluator also requires equal prompt/decode token counts across recipes.
- llama.cpp's
predicted_nincludes the first token whilepredicted_msbegins after it; the driver subtracts that token so decode throughput matches the Transformers inter-token convention. performance_contract.pyrejects wrong plans, unsigned or incorrectly signed real evidence, wrong config/artifact/runtime/backend/host bindings, missing recipes/concurrency, mixed model revisions, incomplete quality coverage, and failed references.- Every non-synthetic report is Ed25519-signed over the complete canonical JSON,
including raw outcomes and metrics. The contract pins the public key and exact
config SHA-256; the private key remains outside Git at mode
0600. - The signer fingerprint is independently anchored outside this evidence
directory in
../../trusted-evidence-signers.jsonand checked by tests. - Quantized drift remains advisory. Only the near-lossless lane can satisfy the quality gate, and only performance-fit recipes can earn speed/fit benefits.
Evidence files
performance-contract.json— immutable v1 thresholds and stop conditionbenchmark-config.json— exact real-run plan, drivers, artifacts, and hashesresults.json— raw machine-readable per-request and aggregate evidenceresults.txt— human-readable benchmark summarybaseline.json— distilled measurements for later comparisoncontract-evaluation.json— fail-closed v1 verdictquality-parity-diagnosis.json/.md— run/device-scoped signed-evidence summarysummarize-quality-parity.py— verifies both evidence chains and regenerates itgpu-diagnostic-config.json— exact ROCm diagnostic artifacts and runtimesgpu-diagnostic-results.json/.txt— signed GPU outcomes and summarycommands.txt— reproducible conversion, benchmark, evaluation, and test commandsBLOCKED.md— downstream stop-condition handoffknown-unrelated-failure.md— clean-base reproduction of the tracker race../../trusted-evidence-signers.json— repository-reviewed signer fingerprint
Verification
Targeted: 28 passed (5/5 consecutive focused runs)
Latest full suite: 755 passed, 13 skipped
Earlier full suite: 751 passed, 13 skipped
Current cancellation retry matrix, DGR-001: 4/5 passed
Earlier cancellation retry matrix, clean d904c40: 4/5 passed
compileall: passed
git diff --check: passed
Evidence JSON parse/integrity checks: passed
The intermittent tracker cancellation race reproduced at the same rate on the
clean base and is retained in known-unrelated-failure.md; the final full suite
completed green. DGR-001 changes no tracker/proxy files.
The earlier Ralph claim that the full suite was blocked by Protobuf 6.33.6 was
invalid: it used Hermes Agent's internal venv. Verification above used the
project .venv, which has the DGR-002-compatible runtime. Real inference used
.venv-rocm Python 3.12.
Limitations and dependent-story handoff
- The immutable contract result is a 0.5B CPU baseline. The separate Radeon diagnostic is real local GPU evidence, but neither result covers a large model, distributed execution, network transport, or a native shard worker.
- A separate
GGML_HIP=ONllama.cpp build exists and produced GPU timings, but llama-server process VRAM is not measurable by the current driver; GPU memory/fit claims therefore remain ineligible for v1. - Absolute timings are developer-machine measurements; locked ratios and raw artifacts are provided for reproducibility.
- DGR-014 may consume v1 only with the exact plan/evidence requirements enforced
by
performance_contract.py. - DGR-004 and later native-runtime work must not treat DGR-001 completion as a
promotion. V1 says
stop; proceeding requires a human decision backed by a separately versioned GPU/large-model contract or a diagnosed quality fix.