90 lines
7.3 KiB
Plaintext
90 lines
7.3 KiB
Plaintext
# Iteration 1 Log
|
||
|
||
## Metadata
|
||
|
||
- **Task ID**: DGR-014
|
||
- **Task Title**: Enforce the GGUF-versus-safetensors release gate
|
||
- **Description**: MANDATORY FRESH-SESSION CONTEXT: Read `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/RALPH-CONTEXT.md` and `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/14-enforce-the-gguf-versus-safetensors-release-gate.md` complet...
|
||
- **Status**: completed
|
||
- **Task Completed**: Yes
|
||
- **Promise Detected**: Yes
|
||
- **Started At**: 2026-07-16T00:29:25.785Z
|
||
- **Ended At**: 2026-07-16T00:31:54.127Z
|
||
- **Duration**: 2m 28s
|
||
- **Input Tokens**: 804938
|
||
- **Output Tokens**: 9588
|
||
- **Total Tokens**: 814526
|
||
- **Agent**: codex
|
||
- **Model**: gpt-5.4-mini
|
||
- **Sandbox Mode**: auto
|
||
- **Sandbox Network**: Enabled
|
||
--- RAW OUTPUT ---
|
||
I’m reading the release-gate context, the story file, and the dependency evidence first so I can verify the existing state before touching code. After that I’ll check the current progress log and only then decide whether this is already done or needs implementation.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .claude/memory/MEMORY.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/RALPH-CONTEXT.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .ralph-tui/progress.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "pwd && rg --files .claude/memory .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime .ralph-tui | sed -...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/14-enforce-the-gguf-versus-s...
|
||
I have the story contract and dependency list now. Next I’m checking the current repo state and the prerequisite evidence so I can tell whether this is a real implementation task or a verification-only completion.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,240p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/prd.json"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/README.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-011/README.md"
|
||
|
||
[91m[Error: sed: can't read .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-011/README.md: No such file or directory
|
||
][0m
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-012/README.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-013/README.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short'
|
||
One prerequisite is already odd: the repository has `DGR-011` marked as a dependency, but its evidence README is missing. I’m checking the actual status and the available handoff files now so I can tell whether this story is blocked on a prerequisite or just missing documentation.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-011 -maxdepth 2 -type f -printf '...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/architecture.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' docs/adr/0024-distributed-gguf-runtime.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,240p' CONTEXT.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n '\"id\": \"DGR-011\"|\"id\": \"DGR-012\"|\"id\": \"DGR-013\"|\"id\": \"DGR-014\...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '315,360p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/prd.json"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-011/BLOCKED.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/README.md"
|
||
The prerequisite picture is clear enough now: DGR-011 is explicitly blocked on DGR-010, and `prd.json` still has DGR-011 and DGR-014 as `passes: false`. I’m checking whether DGR-014 already has a durable comparison artifact anyway, because if it does this may be a verification-and-close rather than an implementation job.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-014 -maxdepth 2 -type f -printf '...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '414,460p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/prd.json"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n 'Status: done|Status: blocked|promote GGUF|stop the native track|optimize a mea...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n 'DGR-014|release gate|compare' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime -g '"'!**/node...
|
||
I haven’t changed anything yet. I’m checking whether the codebase already contains a DGR-014 comparison path or release-gate evaluator, because if it does I can verify it; if not, the correct outcome is a blocked handoff tied to the missing prerequisite artifact.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-010/BLOCKED.md"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find packages -maxdepth 3 -type f | rg 'performance_contract|benchmark|route_session|...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n 'release gate|performance contract|DGR-014|promote GGUF|stop the native track|o...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,620p' packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' tests/test_performance_contract.py"
|
||
Because the blocker is about mounted-model availability, I’m verifying current storage rather than trusting yesterday’s blocked note. If a certified dense-Llama artifact exists now, I can continue; if not, the honest result is a blocked handoff.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find /run/media/popov/d/DEV/models -maxdepth 4 -type f | sed -n '1,120p'"
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find /run/media/popov/d/DEV/models /run/media/popov/d/DEV/llamacpp/llama.cpp/models -...
|
||
I’ve confirmed the hard blocker: there is still no certified dense-Llama artifact on the mounted drive, so the real comparison cannot be run. I’m writing a blocked handoff instead of fabricating a release-gate result, and I’ll keep the existing unrelated worktree changes untouched.
|
||
The blocker note is in place. I’m doing a quick sanity pass on the patch itself so the handoff is clean and only the intended files changed.
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git diff --check -- .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-014/BLOCKED.md .ra...
|
||
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short'
|
||
DGR-014 is blocked, not complete.
|
||
|
||
What I verified:
|
||
- `DGR-011` is still `passes: false` in `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/prd.json`.
|
||
- `DGR-011` is blocked on `DGR-010`, and `DGR-010` is blocked because there is still no certified dense-Llama artifact on mounted storage.
|
||
- Current mounted model storage still shows Qwen artifacts and llama.cpp vocab files, not the certified dense-Llama GGUF/safetensors pair needed for the comparison.
|
||
|
||
What I changed:
|
||
- Added `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-014/BLOCKED.md`
|
||
- Appended the iteration note to `.ralph-tui/progress.md`
|
||
|
||
What I did not change:
|
||
- I did not update the issue to `Status: done`.
|
||
- I did not touch the existing unrelated worktree changes.
|
||
|
||
Checks:
|
||
- `git diff --check` passed.
|
||
|
||
The blocker to unblock this story is either:
|
||
1. complete `DGR-010` and `DGR-011` with a certified dense-Llama artifact mounted on the configured drive, then rerun the release gate, or
|
||
2. provide the exact certified artifact and route evidence needed for the comparable safetensors vs GGUF run.
|
||
|
||
--- STDERR ---
|
||
warning: `--full-auto` is deprecated; use `--sandbox workspace-write` instead.
|