Files
neuron-tai/docs/issues/44-tracker-shard-source-partial-download.md
2026-07-06 17:11:53 +03:00

3.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

US-044 — Tracker as model-file source; nodes download only their shard

Status: planned Priority: High (blocks multi-machine big-model serving; pairs with US-042) Stage: Designed (grill remaining decisions before build)

Context

Common deployment: the tracker and the first node share a machine that already holds the model files (e.g. /run/media/popov/DATA/llm/safetensor). When a second node joins with no model selected, the tracker assigns it the uncovered layer range — and today that node then downloads the entire snapshot from HuggingFace, even for a 20-layer shard of a 160 GB model.

What exists already (build on it, don't duplicate):

  • Nodes serve their shard dir as a tar at GET /v1/shards/download with checksum verification; download_shard tries assignment-provided peers before HF (downloader.py). But it only matches identical layer ranges, and the HF fallback runs snapshot_download of the whole repo.
  • The torch path (--model-id) bypasses download_shard entirely: TorchModelShardfrom_pretrained downloads and loads into RAM the full model, then executes only the assigned layers. Sharding currently saves compute, not memory or bandwidth.

Design

  1. Tracker --models-dir PATH (env MESHNET_MODELS_DIR). When set, the tracker indexes HF-layout snapshots under it and advertises itself as a model-file source in /v1/nodes/assign responses.
  2. Layer-aware file selection. For safetensors models, read model.safetensors.index.json and map the assigned layer range → the subset of weight files containing those layers, plus the always-needed files (config, tokenizer, index, embeddings/head files for head/tail shards). Serve exactly that subset (tar stream, per-file checksums). GGUF (US-042): single file or naive byte-range — phase 2.
  3. Node download order: exact-shard peer (existing) → tracker/peer file subset (new) → HF snapshot_download with allow_patterns for the same subset (new — stop downloading the whole repo even from HF) → full snapshot (last resort).
  4. Partial LOAD (the hard half). Downloading a subset is wasted unless the node stops instantiating the full model: build the model skeleton on the meta device, materialize only assigned layers (+embeddings/norm/head as role requires) from the local files, leave the rest on meta. Without this, an 80 GB machine can never hold a shard of a 160 GB model regardless of how the bytes arrive. This is the acceptance bar for the issue.

Open questions (grill before building)

  • Trust: joining nodes fetch weights from the tracker/peers — checksum against what root of trust? (HF etag/sha vs tracker-signed manifest.)
  • Disk layout: partial snapshots must not corrupt the HF cache dir; probably a meshnet-owned layout keyed by repo+revision.
  • Serving cost: a 100 GB tar stream per joining node on the tracker box — rate-limit/queue? LAN-only heuristic?

Acceptance criteria

  • Two-machine test: machine A (tracker + node, holds full snapshot) serves layers 0k; machine B joins with no model and receives only the files for its assigned range from A — nothing fetched from HF
  • Machine B's resident memory scales with its shard size, not model size
  • Checksums verified end-to-end; corrupted transfer falls back cleanly
  • Single-node/full-model flows unchanged
  • python -m pytest passes from repo root