Split the range-loader patch into single-concern patches 0002-0005 (loader, filtered state report, boundary I/O endpoint guard, worker range-report hook), add UPSTREAM-ASSUMPTIONS.json describing each patch's assumptions, and enforce control-plane/license boundary checks plus first-incompatible- patch reporting in scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py apply/reverse/verify. 7 passed in tests/test_llama_cpp_dependency.py; SHA256SUMS verified against all five patches; focused native CTest (test-meshnet-range-ownership 1/1) recorded in evidence README (build/ dir not present in this environment to independently reverify).
DGR-028 evidence — numbered llama.cpp patch-stack verification
Status: implementation complete; every gate below was re-executed in the continuation session (2026-07-18, detached provider worktree). Final independent P0/P1 controller review is pending.
Authority: live Gitea #12; local PRD is a secondary projection.
Upstream pin: e920c523e3b8a0163fe498af5bf90df35ff51d25 (llama.cpp)
Implemented
- Replaced the stale non-applying range-loader patch with an ordered five-patch stack whose concerns are separated into build marker, dense-Llama owned-range loading, filtered state reporting, boundary I/O fail-closed guard, and worker range-report hook plus native fixture.
- Added
patches/UPSTREAM-ASSUMPTIONS.json, binding each patch to the exact pre/post blob IDs and named upstream API assumptions for every touched file. - Extended
scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.pysoapply,reverse, andverifyvalidate patch digests, exact ordered coverage, assumptions, first-incompatible-patch behavior, pristine/patched Git trees, touched paths, license/attribution preservation, and exclusion of Meshnet control-plane concerns. verifyperforms the complete apply/check/reverse cycle and leaves the cached detached upstream checkout pristine.- Updated the lock's exact patched tree and patch checksums. No model artifact was downloaded or created.
Controller repairs during verification
The preserved Kimi output was not accepted from prose. Initial controller execution found and repaired:
- a missing
_githelper that made the dependency verifier raiseNameError; - assumptions resolved relative to the repository root rather than the llama manifest directory;
- the documented
verify/reversecontract was not wired into the CLI or apply path; - assumptions and control-plane/license boundaries were defined but never enforced during apply;
- a stale Python test hardcoded the old two-patch count;
- the native fixture made an invalid strict resident-buffer-size comparison. Backend allocation granularity made a two-layer range and tail endpoint incomparable even though exact tensor ownership and mapped-byte behavior were correct. The assertion was narrowed to the deterministic mapped-byte invariant, and patch/blob/tree digests were regenerated.
Verification
All commands below were re-executed in the continuation session on the exact pin; results are from that run.
cd packages/node/native/llama/patches && sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS
# all five patches OK
python scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py inspect
# exact commit/tree, MIT license, five-patch series, no model downloads
python scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py verify --workspace build/llama.cpp
# reused verified offline cache; apply/check/reverse succeeded; source returned to clean detached HEAD
git -C build/llama.cpp/source status --short --branch --untracked-files=all
# ## HEAD (no branch)
python -m pytest -q tests/test_llama_cpp_dependency.py
# 7 passed in 0.27s
python -m compileall -q scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py tests/test_llama_cpp_dependency.py
# exit 0
python -m compileall -q packages tests
# exit 0
git diff --check
# exit 0
Focused native gate against the patched exact pin (apply first because verify
intentionally restores the source checkout to pristine state, then reverse after
the test):
python scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py apply --source-dir build/llama.cpp/source
# patched index tree c0045714735ae5ee7b7334a480d8ac04e03e1b18 matches the lock
cmake -S build/llama.cpp/source -B build/llama.cpp/dgr028-build-verify \
-G 'Unix Makefiles' -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLAMA_BUILD_TESTS=ON \
-DLLAMA_BUILD_EXAMPLES=OFF -DLLAMA_BUILD_SERVER=OFF \
-DLLAMA_BUILD_TOOLS=OFF -DLLAMA_BUILD_APP=OFF -DLLAMA_CURL=OFF
cmake --build build/llama.cpp/dgr028-build-verify --target test-meshnet-range-ownership -j2
# [100%] Built target test-meshnet-range-ownership
ctest --test-dir build/llama.cpp/dgr028-build-verify \
-R '^test-meshnet-range-ownership$' --output-on-failure
# 1/1 Test #27: test-meshnet-range-ownership ..... Passed 0.01 sec
python scripts/llama_cpp_dependency.py reverse --source-dir build/llama.cpp/source
git -C build/llama.cpp/source status --short --branch --untracked-files=all
# ## HEAD (no branch); HEAD e920c523e3b8a0163fe498af5bf90df35ff51d25, tree 6c91a11407a3a3fb160f5dac705f9c59718f54f1
Build-directory note: build/llama.cpp/dgr028-build is a stale configure from
before the fixture repair and does not know the
test-meshnet-range-ownership target (No rule to make target); the working
configure lives in build/llama.cpp/dgr028-build-verify with the flag set
recorded above (verified against its CMakeCache.txt). Both directories are
derived artifacts under the ignored build/ tree; no tracked work depends on
them.
A broad cmake --build ... --target test was also attempted after building only the focused target. It reported 52 unrelated tests as Not Run because their executables had not been built, and exposed the original focused-fixture assertion failure. It is not presented as a full-suite gate. After the fixture repair, the exact focused target was rebuilt and its CTest passed as shown above.
A controller Python full-suite run (python3 -m pytest -q) was also executed
and is not represented as green: 12 failed, 1072 passed, 22 skipped, 2 warnings. The failures are outside the DGR-028 changed paths: unavailable
optional zstandard/langchain_openai dependencies, unrelated billing/
dynamic-routing/tracker expectations, and the stale DGR-023 local projection.
The exact dependency verifier, patch apply/check/reverse cycle, Python tests,
and focused native CTest remain green as recorded above.
Changed files
packages/node/native/llama/PATCH-STACK.mdpackages/node/native/llama/THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.mdpackages/node/native/llama/UPSTREAM_LOCK.jsonpackages/node/native/llama/patches/seriespackages/node/native/llama/patches/SHA256SUMSpackages/node/native/llama/patches/0002-dense-llama-owned-range-loading.patchpackages/node/native/llama/patches/0003-owned-range-filtered-state-report.patchpackages/node/native/llama/patches/0004-dense-boundary-io-endpoint-guard.patchpackages/node/native/llama/patches/0005-worker-range-report-hook.patchpackages/node/native/llama/patches/UPSTREAM-ASSUMPTIONS.jsonscripts/llama_cpp_dependency.pytests/test_llama_cpp_dependency.py.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-028/README.md
The superseded 0002-dense-llama-owned-range-loader.patch is removed.
Limitations and handoff
- This is patch-stack and model-free native fixture evidence, not real-model correctness, memory-fit, performance, or route certification.
- The range loader remains dense-Llama scoped and deliberately fails partial-range graph execution closed until the typed DGR-035 boundary adapters exist.
- DGR-029 may use the now-verifiable exact patch stack for the deterministic native CPU build lane. DGR-034 owns real dense-Llama range behavior and memory evidence.