3.2 KiB
DGR-050: Validate upstream V4 MoE and hash-routing execution under ranged ownership
- Status / triage: specification only;
ready-for-agent;passes: false - Execution mode:
AFK - Milestone:
M3 - Dependencies:
DGR-045,DGR-047 - Blocks (derived):
DGR-051 - Labels:
area:deepseek-v4,area:moe,type:runtime,priority:p0,ready-for-agent - Evidence class:
real-model - Hardware:
optional - Model:
deepseek-v4-flash - Upstream:
yes
Objective / description
Fresh Ralph session: read .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/RALPH-CONTEXT.md, source issue .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/050-validate-upstream-v4-moe-and-hash-routing-execution-under-ranged-ownership.md, and evidence READMEs for dependencies (DGR-045, DGR-047) before changing code. Inspect live source/tests rather than trusting legacy pass states. Objective: Validate the pinned upstream llama.cpp V4 MoE and hash-routing graph when layers are range-owned, without reimplementing routing or expert kernels in Meshnet.
Acceptance criteria
- Load range-owned tensors for 256 routed plus one shared expert and validate upstream execution activates six routed experts where specified.
- Validate the first three upstream hash-routed layers receive exact token-ID sideband across splits before, within, and after them.
- Compare upstream whole-model and ranged router/expert outputs, shared-expert contribution, and malformed sideband failures.
- Document that llama.cpp owns V4 MoE, attention, hash routing, graph, and kernels; no expert-parallel WAN collective or Meshnet reimplementation is introduced.
- Applicable shared quality gates in
prd.jsonpass, and the evidence handoff records exact commands/results, changed files, limitations, and dependency handoff.
Shared quality gates
- Targeted deterministic tests pass; Python changes also pass
python -m compileall packages tests. git diff --checkpasses.- Default tests are model-download-free, API-credit-free, and GPU-free.
- Evidence README records exact changed files, commands/results, limitations, and dependency handoff; no fabricated evidence or inherited completion credit.
- Native changes pass focused out-of-tree CMake build and CTest; patch changes verify clean apply/check/reverse against the exact llama.cpp pin.
- Runs are opt-in and record exact artifact/split hashes, runtime/upstream pin, backend/driver, hardware, network, commands, and raw metrics. Model artifacts use configured mounted-drive storage and never
/home. - Preserve existing Transformers behavior and backend-agnostic Tracker routing/load balancing/billing/relay semantics unless an explicit versioned contract says otherwise. One scoped story commit is expected during execution, but this specification-materialization change is not committed.
Evidence handoff
Write and verify .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-050/README.md. Until every criterion and applicable gate has real evidence, this story remains passes: false. Legacy evidence is provenance only, not completion credit.