feat: add DGR-001 performance contract

.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# DGR-001 — performance contract baseline
+
+## Files changed
+
+- `packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py`
+- `tests/test_performance_contract.py`
+- `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/01-lock-the-safetensors-versus-gguf-performance-contract.md`
+- `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json`
+
+## What this slice does
+
+- Locks the DGR-001 benchmark contract in code.
+- Pins the architecture-aligned baseline to **DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat** (`deepseek2`).
+- Uses the smallest DeepSeek-family GGUF target selected for this story: **Q2_K** via `second-state/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat-GGUF`.
+- Exposes a machine-readable JSON contract with:
+  - benchmark lanes for `transformers` safetensors and `llama.cpp` GGUF
+  - concurrency levels `1` and `4`
+  - the required metrics list
+  - an explicit stop condition for “no meaningful speed or fit benefit”
+
+## Exact commands and real results
+
+### Targeted tests
+
+```bash
+pytest -q tests/test_performance_contract.py tests/test_route_session_benchmark.py
+```
+
+Result: `9 passed in 0.14s`
+
+### Contract artifact generation
+
+```bash
+PYTHONPATH=packages/node python -m meshnet_node.performance_contract --json-out .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json
+```
+
+Result: wrote `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json`
+
+### Python compile check
+
+```bash
+python -m compileall packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py tests/test_performance_contract.py
+```
+
+Result: passed
+
+## Limitations
+
+- This slice captures the DGR-001 contract and baseline selection only.
+- It does **not** download or run a real model yet.
+- Real safetensors vs GGUF execution, TTFT/prefill/decode measurements, RSS/VRAM capture, and output-drift comparison are still to be implemented against the contract.
+
+## Compatibility notes
+
+- The contract stays on the DeepSeek2 family to remain close to the DeepSeek-V4-Flash end goal.
+- A smaller non-DeepSeek model can still be used later for loader-plumbing smoke tests, but it does not replace this baseline.
+- Model artifacts must stay on the mounted drive and not under `/home`.
+
+## Dependent-story handoff
+
+Next implementation work should attach to this contract and add the live benchmark runner that actually compares:
+
+1. current Transformers/safetensors recipe
+2. whole-model llama.cpp GGUF recipe
+
+using the same model architecture/revision and the same prompt/context/concurrency settings.

.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+{
+  "benchmark_lanes": [
+    {
+      "concurrency_levels": [
+        1,
+        4
+      ],
+      "id": "transformers-safetensors",
+      "recipe": "current safetensors recipe",
+      "runtime": "transformers"
+    },
+    {
+      "concurrency_levels": [
+        1,
+        4
+      ],
+      "id": "llama-cpp-gguf",
+      "recipe": "whole-model GGUF recipe",
+      "runtime": "llama.cpp"
+    }
+  ],
+  "metrics": [
+    "ttft_ms",
+    "prefill_tok_per_sec",
+    "decode_tok_per_sec",
+    "p50_latency_ms",
+    "p95_latency_ms",
+    "aggregate_throughput_tok_per_sec",
+    "rss_bytes",
+    "vram_bytes",
+    "artifact_bytes",
+    "failure_count",
+    "output_drift"
+  ],
+  "model_target": {
+    "architecture": "deepseek2",
+    "gguf_quant": "Q2_K",
+    "gguf_repo": "second-state/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat-GGUF",
+    "gguf_size_gb": 6.43,
+    "name": "DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat",
+    "rationale": "Smallest DeepSeek-family benchmark anchor that still points toward DeepSeek-V4-Flash; keeps the runtime on the DeepSeek2 path instead of falling back to a tiny but architecture-mismatched smoke model.",
+    "safetensors_repo": "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat"
+  },
+  "notes": [
+    "Real model execution stays opt-in and must keep model artifacts on the mounted drive.",
+    "Use the tiny fallback only for loader plumbing smoke tests; it does not replace the architecture-aligned baseline."
+  ],
+  "schema_version": 1,
+  "stop_condition": "Stop if GGUF does not provide a meaningful speed or fit benefit over the safetensors baseline for the chosen DeepSeek-family model target.",
+  "story_id": "DGR-001"
+}

.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/01-lock-the-safetensors-versus-gguf-performance-contract.md

@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ Status: ready-for-agent
 
 As a runtime engineer, I need a controlled baseline so that GGUF work proceeds from measured speed, memory, and quality rather than reputation.
 
+## Baseline model target
+
+Use the smallest *DeepSeek-family* GGUF that still points toward DeepSeek-V4-Flash. Current choice: **DeepSeek-V2-Lite GGUF Q2_K** (~6.5GB, `deepseek2` architecture). Reserve smaller non-DeepSeek fallback models only for loader plumbing smoke tests if needed; they do not count as the DGR-001 architecture-aligned baseline.
+
 ## Expected durable outputs
 
 - Benchmark harness and deterministic tests