fix: harden DGR-001 performance contract evidence
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,15 +22,23 @@
|
||||
"llama-cpp-near-lossless-quality",
|
||||
"llama-cpp-quantized-performance-fit"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"required_concurrency_levels": [1, 4],
|
||||
"required_concurrency_levels": [
|
||||
1,
|
||||
4
|
||||
],
|
||||
"required_controlled_variables": [
|
||||
"model architecture",
|
||||
"model revision",
|
||||
"machine and device",
|
||||
"formatted prompts and context lengths",
|
||||
"output length and greedy sampling policy"
|
||||
]
|
||||
],
|
||||
"required_plan_sha256": "efe24690a9a7164bac6ab3fd0a6b22f078fc08aaefcfb96210ddf154e6050570",
|
||||
"minimum_prompt_count": 3,
|
||||
"minimum_repeats": 3,
|
||||
"minimum_output_tokens": 32,
|
||||
"required_device": "cpu"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"stop_condition": "Stop the native llama.cpp/GGUF track when, on the same machine and device as the Transformers/safetensors reference and under this plan, no performance-fit GGUF recipe delivers either a meaningful speed benefit (at least 25% higher single-request decode tokens/sec without more than 25% worse TTFT, or at least 25% higher aggregate throughput under concurrency) or a meaningful fit benefit (at least 25% lower peak resident memory), or when the near-lossless quality lane fails.",
|
||||
"stop_condition": "Stop the native llama.cpp/GGUF track when, on the same machine and device as the Transformers/safetensors reference and under this plan, no performance-fit GGUF recipe delivers either a meaningful speed benefit (>=25% higher single-request decode tokens/sec without a >25% worse TTFT, or >=25% higher aggregate throughput under concurrency) or a meaningful fit benefit (>=25% lower peak resident memory), or when the near-lossless quality lane fails, which indicates a broken runtime rather than a quantization trade-off.",
|
||||
"notes": "Quantized performance-fit output drift is reported as advisory only. It is not numerical-equivalence evidence. DGR-014 consumes this immutable v1 contract."
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user