7.2 KiB
Transformer Model Input/Output Structure
FIXED ISSUE: Batch Data Deletion Bug
Problem: Training was failing after epoch 1 with "At least one timeframe must be provided" Root Cause: Batch tensors were being deleted after each use in the training loop, but the same batch dictionaries were being reused across all epochs. Solution: Removed batch deletion from inside the epoch loop and moved cleanup to after all epochs complete.
Current Model Architecture
INPUT Structure (Multi-Timeframe)
The model accepts the following inputs in the forward() method:
forward(
# Price data for different timeframes - [batch, seq_len, 5] OHLCV
price_data_1s=None, # 1-second timeframe
price_data_1m=None, # 1-minute timeframe
price_data_1h=None, # 1-hour timeframe
price_data_1d=None, # 1-day timeframe
# Reference data
btc_data_1m=None, # BTC reference - [batch, seq_len, 5]
# Additional features
cob_data=None, # COB orderbook data - [batch, seq_len, 100]
tech_data=None, # Technical indicators - [batch, 40]
market_data=None, # Market context (pivots, volume) - [batch, 30]
position_state=None, # Current position state - [batch, 5]
# Legacy support
price_data=None # Fallback to single timeframe
)
At least one timeframe (price_data_1s, 1m, 1h, or 1d) must be provided, otherwise the model raises:
ValueError: At least one timeframe must be provided
OUTPUT Structure
The model returns a dictionary with the following predictions:
outputs = {
# PRIMARY OUTPUTS (trained with loss):
'action_logits': tensor, # [batch, 3] - BUY/SELL/HOLD logits
'action_probs': tensor, # [batch, 3] - softmax probabilities
'price_prediction': tensor, # [batch, 1] - next price change ratio
'confidence': tensor, # [batch, 1] - prediction confidence
# TREND ANALYSIS (trained with loss):
'trend_analysis': {
'angle_radians': tensor, # [batch, 1] - trend angle in radians
'steepness': tensor, # [batch, 1] - trend steepness (0-1)
'direction': tensor # [batch, 1] - direction (-1/0/+1)
},
# NEXT CANDLE PREDICTIONS (evaluated but NOT trained):
'next_candles': {
'1s': tensor, # [batch, 5] - predicted OHLCV for 1s
'1m': tensor, # [batch, 5] - predicted OHLCV for 1m
'1h': tensor, # [batch, 5] - predicted OHLCV for 1h
'1d': tensor, # [batch, 5] - predicted OHLCV for 1d
},
'btc_next_candle': tensor, # [batch, 5] - predicted BTC OHLCV
# PIVOT PREDICTIONS:
'next_pivots': {
'L1': {
'price': tensor, # [batch, 1] - pivot price
'type_prob_high': tensor, # [batch, 1] - probability of high
'type_prob_low': tensor, # [batch, 1] - probability of low
'pivot_type': tensor, # [batch, 1] - 0=high, 1=low
'confidence': tensor # [batch, 1] - confidence
},
# Same structure for L2, L3, L4, L5
},
# AUXILIARY OUTPUTS:
'volatility_prediction': tensor, # [batch, 1]
'trend_strength_prediction': tensor, # [batch, 1]
'uncertainty_mean': tensor, # [batch, 1]
'uncertainty_std': tensor # [batch, 1]
}
TRAINING TARGETS (in batch)
batch = {
# Input features (see INPUT Structure above)
'price_data_1s': tensor,
'price_data_1m': tensor,
'price_data_1h': tensor,
'price_data_1d': tensor,
'btc_data_1m': tensor,
'cob_data': tensor,
'tech_data': tensor,
'market_data': tensor,
'position_state': tensor,
# Training targets:
'actions': tensor, # [batch] - target action (0/1/2)
'future_prices': tensor, # [batch, 1] - actual price change ratio
'trade_success': tensor, # [batch, 1] - 1.0 if profitable
'trend_target': tensor, # [batch, 3] - [angle, steepness, direction]
}
LOSS CALCULATION
Current loss function in train_step():
total_loss = action_loss + 0.1 * price_loss + 0.05 * trend_loss
where:
- action_loss: CrossEntropyLoss(action_logits, actions)
- price_loss: MSELoss(price_prediction, future_prices)
- trend_loss: MSELoss(trend_pred, trend_target)
NOTE: Next candle predictions are currently only used for accuracy evaluation, NOT trained directly.
CURRENT ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Issue 1: Next Candle Predictions Not Trained
Status: The model outputs next candle predictions for each timeframe, but these are NOT included in the loss function. Impact: The model is not explicitly learning to predict next candle OHLCV values.
Recommendation: Add next candle loss to training:
# Calculate next candle loss for each available timeframe
candle_loss = 0.0
if 'next_candles' in outputs:
for tf in ['1s', '1m', '1h', '1d']:
if tf in outputs['next_candles'] and f'future_candle_{tf}' in batch:
pred_candle = outputs['next_candles'][tf] # [batch, 5]
target_candle = batch[f'future_candle_{tf}'] # [batch, 5]
candle_loss += MSELoss(pred_candle, target_candle)
total_loss = action_loss + 0.1 * price_loss + 0.05 * trend_loss + 0.1 * candle_loss
Issue 2: Annotation Timeframe vs Prediction Timeframe
Current Behavior:
- Annotations are created at a specific point in time
- The model receives multiple timeframes (1s, 1m, 1h, 1d) as input
- Predictions are made for ALL timeframes simultaneously
- Only the 1m timeframe prediction is currently evaluated for accuracy
Question: Should predictions be specific to the annotation's timeframe?
Options:
- Multi-timeframe predictions (current): Keep predicting all timeframes, add loss for each
- Annotation-specific predictions: Only predict/train on the timeframe that matches the annotation
- Weighted predictions: Weight the loss by the annotation's timeframe (e.g., if annotated on 1m, weight 1m prediction higher)
Issue 3: Missing Target Data for Next Candles
Current: The batch only contains future_prices (next close price change)
Needed: To train next candle predictions, we need full OHLCV targets:
future_candle_1s: [batch, 5] - next 1s candle OHLCVfuture_candle_1m: [batch, 5] - next 1m candle OHLCVfuture_candle_1h: [batch, 5] - next 1h candle OHLCVfuture_candle_1d: [batch, 5] - next 1d candle OHLCV
Location to add: ANNOTATE/core/real_training_adapter.py in _convert_annotation_to_transformer_batch()
SUMMARY
✅ Fixed: Batch deletion bug causing epoch 2+ failures ✅ Working: Model can predict next candles for all timeframes ✅ Working: Model can predict trend vector (angle, steepness, direction) ❌ Missing: Loss calculation for next candle predictions ❌ Missing: Target data (future OHLCV) for next candle training ⚠️ Unclear: Should predictions be timeframe-specific or multi-timeframe?
NEXT STEPS
- Add future OHLCV target data to training batches
- Add next candle loss to the training loop
- Clarify prediction strategy: Single timeframe vs multi-timeframe
- Test training with enhanced loss function