21 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
21 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
<!-- Graph Database -->
|
||
|
||
|
||
Rich Relationships: Graph databases excel at managing highly interconnected data, allowing you to efficiently model, store, and query complex networks of relationships.
|
||
|
||
Performance: They are optimized for traversing complex relationships and can perform deep queries very fast, unlike traditional databases where join-intensive queries can be slow.
|
||
|
||
Flexibility: They typically allow for schema-less or schema-flexible data, making them adaptable to evolving data models without significant redesign.
|
||
|
||
Intuitive Query Language: Many graph databases use query languages like Cypher (Neo4j), which are powerful yet readable, making complex queries more straightforward to construct and understand.
|
||
|
||
Cons:
|
||
|
||
Scalability: Horizontal scaling can be challenging with graph databases, as they are inherently designed for deep, computationally intense traversals.
|
||
|
||
Specialized Knowledge: The need for understanding specific query languages and graph theory can steepen the learning curve.
|
||
|
||
Resource Intensity: Maintaining high-performance levels, especially with very large datasets, can require significant computational resources.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Python is widely adopted in the data science community, offering extensive libraries and frameworks for both graph databases (like py2neo for Neo4j) and vector databases (like milvus-py for Milvus). It’s particularly strong in analytics, machine learning, and AI, which aligns well with the use cases of vector databases. |