# DGR-001 — performance contract baseline ## Files changed - `packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py` - `tests/test_performance_contract.py` - `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/01-lock-the-safetensors-versus-gguf-performance-contract.md` - `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json` ## What this slice does - Locks the DGR-001 benchmark contract in code. - Pins the architecture-aligned baseline to **DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat** (`deepseek2`). - Uses the same model on both sides of the comparison: - **safetensors:** `deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat` in **BF16** - **GGUF:** `second-state/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat-GGUF` in **Q2_K** - Exposes a machine-readable JSON contract with: - benchmark lanes for `transformers` safetensors and `llama.cpp` GGUF on **CPU** and **GPU** - concurrency levels `1` and `4` - the required metrics list - an explicit stop condition for “no meaningful speed or fit benefit” - Adds a deterministic stub benchmark report so the contract now has an executable report shape end to end. ## Recent benchmark runner slice The runner currently uses a deterministic stub backend to exercise the comparison matrix without downloading a model. It emits: - `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json` - `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/stub-benchmark-report.json` The report includes per-device comparisons for: - `transformers-safetensors-cpu` vs `llama-cpp-gguf-cpu` - `transformers-safetensors-gpu` vs `llama-cpp-gguf-gpu` and records the memory metric (`rss_bytes` on CPU, `vram_bytes` on GPU), decode speedup, artifact ratio, and output drift. ## Live endpoint CLI wiring The contract CLI can now drive the live endpoint runner. Passing one `--live-endpoint LANE_ID=URL` mapping per contract lane (plus `--live-benchmark-out`) invokes `run_real_model_endpoint_benchmark` against already-running OpenAI-compatible servers and writes the report using the same schema as the stub: ```bash PYTHONPATH=packages/node python -m meshnet_node.performance_contract \ --live-endpoint transformers-safetensors-cpu=http://127.0.0.1:8001 \ --live-endpoint llama-cpp-gguf-cpu=http://127.0.0.1:8002 \ --live-endpoint transformers-safetensors-gpu=http://127.0.0.1:8003 \ --live-endpoint llama-cpp-gguf-gpu=http://127.0.0.1:8004 \ --live-benchmark-out .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/live-benchmark-report.json ``` `--live-model` overrides the model name sent in requests (defaults to the contract's safetensors repo). Without any `--live-endpoint` flags the CLI behaves exactly as before: it writes the contract JSON and, with `--benchmark-out`, the deterministic stub report. ## Exact commands and real results ### Targeted tests ```bash PYTHONPATH=packages/node pytest -q tests/test_performance_contract.py tests/test_route_session_benchmark.py ``` Result: `19 passed in 0.11s` ### Contract artifact generation ```bash PYTHONPATH=packages/node python -m meshnet_node.performance_contract --json-out .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json ``` Result: wrote `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-001/performance-contract.json` ### Python compile check ```bash python -m compileall packages/node/meshnet_node/performance_contract.py tests/test_performance_contract.py ``` Result: passed ## Public relay smoke benchmark (2026-07-15) A real streamed request was run through the public tracker — **not** by connecting directly to the private node address: ```text https://meshnet.2.d-popov.com/v1/chat/completions -> wss://meshnet.2.d-popov.com/ws -> wss://meshnet.2.d-popov.com/rpc/7j77FsPY1evV8tuf-7000 -> local CUDA node, Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct layers 0-23 ``` The local public-tracker node had an expired proof and a wedged HTTP server. A graceful restart refreshed its CUDA capability proof in `336 ms`, restored `admitted`/`routable` status, and reconnected its relay endpoint. Measured streaming results after recovery: | metric | result | | --- | ---: | | warm-up TTFT | 420.80 ms | | warm-up elapsed | 610.23 ms | | p50 TTFT (3 runs) | 288.26 ms | | p50 elapsed (3 runs) | 363.20 ms | | tracker-recorded relay throughput | 58.18-65.25 tok/s | | HTTP status | 200 for all runs | The tracker recorded `relay: true` and the local node ID `7j77FsPY-b32476219492` for each completion. Full redacted evidence is in `public-relay-smoke-benchmark.json`. The other connected node is still alive but **not routable** because its capability proof is stale. It must revalidate before a multi-node shard/relay test can run. ## Limitations - This slice still uses a deterministic stub backend for the core comparison matrix. - It now also includes a live endpoint runner, reachable from the CLI via `--live-endpoint`/`--live-benchmark-out`, that fans out one OpenAI-compatible request per lane when the caller provides endpoints; the CLI does not start those servers. - It does **not** download or run a real model from within the repo. - Real safetensors vs GGUF execution, TTFT/prefill/decode measurements, RSS/VRAM capture, and output-drift comparison are still to be implemented against the contract. ## Compatibility notes - The contract stays on the DeepSeek2 family to remain close to the DeepSeek-V4-Flash end goal. - A smaller non-DeepSeek model can still be used later for loader-plumbing smoke tests, but it does not replace this baseline. - Model artifacts must stay on the mounted drive and not under `/home`. ## Dependent-story handoff Next implementation work should attach to this contract and add the live benchmark runner that actually compares: 1. current Transformers/safetensors recipe 2. whole-model llama.cpp GGUF recipe using the same model architecture/revision and the same prompt/context/concurrency settings.