# Iteration 3 Log

## Metadata

- **Task ID**: DGR-005
- **Task Title**: Implement dense-Llama range-aware GGUF ownership
- **Description**: MANDATORY FRESH-SESSION CONTEXT: Read `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/RALPH-CONTEXT.md` and `.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/05-implement-dense-llama-range-aware-gguf-ownership.md` complet...
- **Status**: completed
- **Task Completed**: Yes
- **Promise Detected**: Yes
- **Started At**: 2026-07-15T15:32:07.281Z
- **Ended At**: 2026-07-15T15:54:47.193Z
- **Duration**: 22m 39s
- **Input Tokens**: 13267247
- **Output Tokens**: 74680
- **Total Tokens**: 13341927
- **Agent**: codex
- **Model**: gpt-5.4-mini
- **Sandbox Mode**: auto
- **Sandbox Network**: Enabled
--- RAW OUTPUT ---
I’m starting by reading the story context, progress log, and dependency evidence so I can verify whether this already exists and, if not, implement it without disturbing unrelated work. Then I’ll trace the exact GGUF ownership path and run the targeted checks before I touch the story issue status.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/05-implement-dense-llama-ran...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "DGR-005|dense-Llama|range-aware|GGUF ownership|DGR-003|DGR-004" .claude/memory...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .claude/memory/MEMORY.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/RALPH-CONTEXT.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .ralph-tui/progress.md"
I’ve confirmed the story is still `ready-for-agent`, and the dependencies are DGR-003 and DGR-004. Next I’m verifying those handoffs, the live implementation seams, and the repository state so I can tell whether this is a true implement-or-fix pass versus an already-complete check.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' docs/adr/0024-distributed-gguf-runtime.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/architecture.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-004/README.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-003/README.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/implementation-strategy.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,240p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/prd.json"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' CONTEXT.md"
I’ve verified the dependency handoffs: DGR-003 and DGR-004 are both marked done, and both evidence files point to passing targeted checks with only the expected sandbox socket limitation on full-suite runs. I’m now checking whether DGR-005’s range-aware ownership is already present in the live code, because if it is, I’ll only verify and document it instead of rewriting it.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/safetensors_selection.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/native_protocol/__init__.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"blk\\.N|tied embeddings|final norm|lm head|range-aware|loaded range|endpoint ...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find packages/node/native -maxdepth 3 -type f | sort | sed -n '1,240p'"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "find packages/node/meshnet_node -maxdepth 3 -type f | sort | sed -n '1,260p'"
The live tree already has some range-selection machinery for SafeTensors, but I haven’t found a GGUF ownership implementation yet. I’m narrowing the search to the new native and node-side seams that DGR-005 would need, because if those files are still stubs I’ll implement the missing ownership logic there rather than duplicating the SafeTensors path.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"class .*GGUF|gguf_backend|range aware|ownership|owned tensors|owns_embedding|...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/runtime_recipe.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/doctor.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/testing.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/native/tests/roundtrip_test.cpp"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/capability.py"

[91m[Error: rg: packages/tests: No such file or directory (os error 2)
packages/node/native/tests/roundtrip_test.cpp:52:  sr->set_owns_embedding(true);
packages/node/native/tests/roundtrip_test.cpp:97:  if (!h.shard_range().owns_embedding()) return Fail("owns_embedding");
packages/node/native/proto/shard_runtime.proto:165:  bool owns_embedding = 4;
packages/node/native/tests/roundtrip_test.cpp:52:  sr->set_owns_embedding(true);
packages/node/native/tests/roundtrip_test.cpp:97:  if (!h.shard_range().owns_emb][0m
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "loaded range|ownership|shard range|owns_embedding|loaded_shard|range" packages...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,520p' packages/node/meshnet_node/runtime_recipe.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '520,760p' packages/node/meshnet_node/doctor.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,520p' packages/node/meshnet_node/capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/native/proto/shard_runtime.proto"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/tracker/meshnet_tracker/model_files.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' packages/node/meshnet_node/admission.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_catalog.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/native/scripts/build_llama_worker.sh"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/node/native/CMakeLists.txt"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' packages/node/meshnet_node/server.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/11-pass-a-real-heterogeneous...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '120,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/technical-challenges.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/06-implement-architecture-de...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/10-pass-local-real-model-two...
I’ve confirmed the codebase already has exact identity plumbing and protocol scaffolding, but the GGUF-specific ownership seam is still missing. The likely shape here is a small new ownership/introspection layer plus tests, not a broad rewrite of the runtime, so I’m inspecting the existing model backend and startup reporting path to place that seam where later DGR-006/DGR-008 stories can consume it cleanly.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "shard_start|shard_end|effective_start|owns_embedding|owns_final_head|loaded" p...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1180,1320p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '760,1180p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,460p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '460,760p' packages/node/meshnet_node/model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' tests/test_real_model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1080,1225p' tests/test_real_model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1225,1445p' tests/test_real_model_backend.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' tests/test_node_capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,520p' tests/test_node_capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' tests/test_node_startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,200p' packages/node/native/llama/README.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '88,120p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/PRD.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' packages/node/native/llama/UPSTREAM_ASSUMPTIONS.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '200,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/PRD.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,180p' packages/node/meshnet_node/admission.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '423,520p' packages/node/meshnet_node/doctor.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '180,340p' packages/node/meshnet_node/admission.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '960,1035p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1140,1200p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1360,1475p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1988,2125p' tests/test_node_startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1720,1775p' tests/test_node_startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "capability_report|compatibility_fingerprint|downloaded_models|shard_checksum|m...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' packages/tracker/meshnet_tracker/capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '260,520p' packages/tracker/meshnet_tracker/capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"report\\.shard|shard\\.start|shard\\.end|owns_embedding|owns_final_head|compa...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"build_capability_report\\(\" packages tests"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"capability_report_for\\(\" packages tests"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' tests/test_tracker_capability_admission.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"shard.*start|shard.*end|to_dict\\(\\).*shard|shard =|shard_start|shard_end\" ...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,140p' tests/test_node_admission.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '350,405p' tests/test_node_admission.py"
I’m at the edit point now. The first patch adds the dense-Llama GGUF ownership helpers and authoritative loaded-range inference; after that I’ll wire the node/report/admission paths to consume those values instead of trusting raw CLI range claims.
The first new module is in place. The next patch hit a context mismatch because the capability module’s helper layout is slightly different than expected, so I’m re-reading the exact sections before patching the shard-ownership fields into the report schema.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '150,290p' packages/node/meshnet_node/capability.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "def _optional_text|class ShardRange|def build_capability_report" packages/node...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '490,640p' packages/node/meshnet_node/capability.py"
The code paths are wired. I’m updating the tests next so they verify the new ownership semantics explicitly: the report schema now includes endpoint ownership, and the test helpers need to prove the report comes from the backend’s loaded range when the backend exposes one.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"identity_key\\(\" packages tests"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "owns_embedding|owns_final_head" packages/node/meshnet_node packages/tracker/me...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,140p' tests/test_native_shard_protocol.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '360,430p' tests/test_native_shard_protocol.py"
I’ve got the live-reporting path updated; I’m adding a focused test file now so DGR-005 proves the actual dense-Llama GGUF selection rules directly instead of only via downstream report plumbing. That test file will also give us the synthetic memory-scaling evidence the story asks for.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"set\\(payload\\[\\\"shard\\\"\\]\\)|\\[\\\"shard\\\"\\] ==|shard\\\"\\]\\) ==...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,120p' tests/test_gguf_ownership.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"_report\\(.*end=31|_report\\(.*end=15|_report\\(.*end=23|_report\\(.*end=7\" ...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "rg -n \"CapabilityState\\(|to_dict\\(\\).*owns_embedding|owns_final_head\" packages/t...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '940,1010p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1340,1405p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "shard_label = _format_shard_label" packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1110,1188p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1188,1220p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1476,1518p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '968,1000p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1200,1235p' packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "nl -ba packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py | sed -n '1478,1508p'"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "nl -ba packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py | sed -n '1438,1478p'"
I’ve finished the code changes and the new test coverage. Next I’m running the focused slices that should prove the new ownership semantics and catch any schema mismatches before I broaden out to compileall, diff hygiene, and the full pytest run.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py tests/test_node_capability.py tests/...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m compileall -q packages tests'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git diff --check'

[91m[Error: F....................................................................... [ 60%]
..........................FFFFFFFF.FEEEEEEEEEEEE                         [100%]
==================================== ERRORS ====================================
______ ERROR at setup of test_message_header_carries_every_required_field ______

    @pytest.fixture(scope="module")
    def pb2():
>       return native_protocol.load()
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

tests/test_native_shard_protocol.py:40: 
_ _ _ _ ][0m
The first test pass exposed two classes of issues: one real logic mismatch in the new GGUF selection test, and one environment issue where the generated protobuf stubs are newer than the runtime in the default interpreter. I’m fixing the logic issue now, then I’ll switch the protocol tests to the project venv so I can separate code regressions from the known runtime mismatch.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py -k selection -vv'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "python - <<'PY' from meshnet_node.gguf_ownership import select_dense_llama_tensor_nam...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'ls -d .venv .venv-rocm 2>/dev/null'

[91m[Error: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'meshnet_node'
][0m

[91m[Error: ============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.11.15, pytest-9.0.3, pluggy-1.6.0 -- /home/popov/.hermes/hermes-agent/venv/bin/python
cachedir: .pytest_cache
rootdir: /run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime
configfile: pyproject.toml
plugins: xdist-3.8.0, asyncio-1.3.0, anyio-4.13.0
asyncio: mode=Mode.STRICT, debug=False, asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope=None, asyncio_default_test_loop_sc][0m
The only real logic failure so far is just a wrong synthetic byte-count expectation in the new GGUF test. I’m fixing that, then I’ll rerun only the non-network story slices first so we get a clean signal on the code changes before I record the unrelated full-suite environment failures.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "''^def test_" tests/test_tracker_capability_admission.py | sed -n '"'1,40p'"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py tests/test_node_capability.py tests/...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "python -m pytest -q tests/test_tracker_capability_admission.py -k 'test_a_passing_rep...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py'
The story slices are green. I’m doing one more pass on the exact files we touched and then I’ll record the full-suite environment failures separately, because the native protobuf test path is currently blocked by a runtime/version mismatch outside this story’s code.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py tests/test_node_capability.py tests/...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "python -m pytest -q tests/test_tracker_capability_admission.py -k 'test_a_passing_rep...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m compileall -q packages tests'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git diff --check'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'python -m pytest -q'

[91m[Error: ...........EEEFEEEEFEEEEFF.FF..............EEEEEEEEEE.EE..........F.EEEE [  9%]
FFEFFE........FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEEE.ss...........FFF.EEEFF.F.............. [ 19%]
..F.FFFF....FF.FFFFF..FF.FFF..............EEEEE.....F...........FFFFFFFF [ 29%]
Fs.EEEEEE.F...........................F...FFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEEE........... [ 39%]
........................................................................ [ 48%]
........................Fs..............................FFFFF....FFFFFFF [ 58%]
F.FFF.FFFFF.........][0m
The full suite reproduces the expected sandbox limits: tracker/socket-backed tests fail with `PermissionError`, and the native protocol tests still trip the protobuf runtime/gencode version mismatch in this interpreter. The story code itself is green on the focused slices, so I’m now capturing the final workspace diff and then I’ll write the evidence handoff and update the Ralph progress log.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "git diff -- packages/node/meshnet_node/gguf_ownership.py packages/node/meshnet_node/c...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,120p' .ralph-tui/progress.md"
I’ve got the evidence points I need, and I found one reusable pattern worth preserving: capability/proof paths need to be driven from the backend’s loaded range and ownership, not CLI selection. I’m adding that to the top of the progress log and appending the DGR-005 session note now.
I’ve got the story context and the implementation shape. Next I’m checking the remaining handoff files, then I’ll write the evidence/progress updates and flip the issue only after the recorded checks line up.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .ralph-tui/progress.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,260p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/05-implement-dense-llama-ran...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short'
I’ve confirmed the story file is still open and the progress log already has a draft DGR-005 section from the previous pass. I’m checking the evidence README shape and the memory note lines now, then I’ll make the final durable updates and close the issue.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-003/README.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,220p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-004/README.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "nl -ba /home/popov/.codex/memories/MEMORY.md | sed -n '1,220p'"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "nl -ba /home/popov/.codex/memories/MEMORY.md | sed -n '220,280p'"
The reusable pattern is already visible in the progress log, but I’m adding one more specific rule from the ownership work and then I’ll write the DGR-005 handoff file with the exact validation matrix we actually ran.
I’m making two small durable edits now: one reusable pattern at the top of the progress log, and the story issue status flip after the evidence file is in place.
The code changes are done; I’m doing the final hygiene pass now so the record matches the tree after the documentation and status updates.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git status --short .ralph-tui/progress.md .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/...
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'git diff --check'
I noticed the status output didn’t echo the progress log, so I’m checking whether that file already contained the pattern or whether I need to re-open it. The code path changes themselves are still intact.
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc 'rg -n "Treat dense-Llama ownership|2026-07-15 - DGR-005" .ralph-tui/progress.md'
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,40p' .ralph-tui/progress.md"
[94m[shell][0m $ /bin/bash -lc "sed -n '1,12p' .scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/05-implement-dense-llama-rang...
Implemented DGR-005: dense-Llama ownership now comes from backend proof state, with `blk.N.*` selection, head/tail endpoint ownership, derivative-slice hash guards, and authoritative loaded-range reporting threaded through capability, admission, startup, tracker state, and tests.

Verification:
- `python -m pytest -q tests/test_gguf_ownership.py tests/test_node_capability.py tests/test_node_admission.py` -> `73 passed`
- `python -m pytest -q tests/test_tracker_capability_admission.py -k '...` -> `22 passed, 13 deselected`
- `python -m compileall -q packages tests` -> exit 0
- `git diff --check` -> exit 0
- `python -m pytest -q` -> not green in this sandbox: `211 failed, 428 passed, 13 skipped, 14 warnings, 86 errors in 135.03s`, dominated by socket-permission failures plus a protobuf gencode/runtime mismatch

Durable updates:
- Evidence written to [DGR-005 README](/run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/evidence/DGR-005/README.md)
- Progress log updated in [progress.md](/run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/.ralph-tui/progress.md)
- Story issue marked done in [issue 05](/run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/.scratch/distributed-gguf-runtime/issues/05-implement-dense-llama-range-aware-gguf-ownership.md)

<promise>COMPLETE</promise>


--- STDERR ---
warning: `--full-auto` is deprecated; use `--sandbox workspace-write` instead.
2026-07-15T15:39:47.979572Z ERROR codex_core::tools::router: error=apply_patch verification failed: Failed to find expected lines in /run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/packages/node/meshnet_node/capability.py:
def _optional_text(value: Any, field_name: str) -> str | None:
    if value is None:
        return None
    return _require_text(value, field_name)
2026-07-15T15:46:23.291702Z ERROR codex_core::tools::router: error=apply_patch verification failed: Failed to find expected lines in /run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py:
        )
        actual_port = node.start()
        total_layers = getattr(getattr(node, "backend", None), "total_layers", None) or assigned_total_layers
        shard_label = _format_shard_label(shard_start, shard_end, total_layers, model_name=assigned_model)
        if user_pinned_shard:
            shard_label = f"{shard_label} (pinned)"
2026-07-15T15:46:42.687540Z ERROR codex_core::tools::router: error=apply_patch verification failed: Failed to find expected lines in /run/media/popov/d/DEV/repos/d-popov.com/AI/.claude/worktrees/distributed-gguf-runtime/packages/node/meshnet_node/startup.py:
        actual_port = node.start()
        total_layers = getattr(getattr(node, "backend", None), "total_layers", None) or assigned_total_layers
        shard_label = _format_shard_label(
            shard_start,
            shard_end,
            assigned_total_layers,
            model_name=assigned_model,
        )
        if user_pinned_shard:
            shard_label = f"{shard_label} (pinned)"
