memory node, neo4j grapph db
This commit is contained in:
21
store-all/story.md
Normal file
21
store-all/story.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
<!-- Graph Database -->
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Rich Relationships: Graph databases excel at managing highly interconnected data, allowing you to efficiently model, store, and query complex networks of relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance: They are optimized for traversing complex relationships and can perform deep queries very fast, unlike traditional databases where join-intensive queries can be slow.
|
||||
|
||||
Flexibility: They typically allow for schema-less or schema-flexible data, making them adaptable to evolving data models without significant redesign.
|
||||
|
||||
Intuitive Query Language: Many graph databases use query languages like Cypher (Neo4j), which are powerful yet readable, making complex queries more straightforward to construct and understand.
|
||||
|
||||
Cons:
|
||||
|
||||
Scalability: Horizontal scaling can be challenging with graph databases, as they are inherently designed for deep, computationally intense traversals.
|
||||
|
||||
Specialized Knowledge: The need for understanding specific query languages and graph theory can steepen the learning curve.
|
||||
|
||||
Resource Intensity: Maintaining high-performance levels, especially with very large datasets, can require significant computational resources.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Python is widely adopted in the data science community, offering extensive libraries and frameworks for both graph databases (like py2neo for Neo4j) and vector databases (like milvus-py for Milvus). It’s particularly strong in analytics, machine learning, and AI, which aligns well with the use cases of vector databases.
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user