cob integration wip 2
This commit is contained in:
134
COB_ARCHITECTURE_ANALYSIS.md
Normal file
134
COB_ARCHITECTURE_ANALYSIS.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
|
||||
# COB System Architecture Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
Analysis of the Consolidated Order Book (COB) system architecture, data sources, redundancies, and launch configurations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Questions & Answers
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Do the COB dashboard and 1B model training use the same data source?
|
||||
|
||||
**Answer: YES** - but with redundant implementations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Data Flow:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
MultiExchangeCOBProvider (core/multi_exchange_cob_provider.py)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
COBIntegration (core/cob_integration.py)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
├── COB Dashboard (web/cob_realtime_dashboard.py)
|
||||
├── Enhanced Orchestrator (core/enhanced_orchestrator.py)
|
||||
└── RealtimeRLCOBTrader (core/realtime_rl_cob_trader.py)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Implementation:**
|
||||
- **Dashboard**: Creates own `COBIntegration(symbols=self.symbols)`
|
||||
- **Training Pipeline**: Uses `EnhancedTradingOrchestrator` with deferred COB integration
|
||||
- **1B RL Trader**: Creates own `COBIntegration(symbols=self.symbols)`
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Are there redundant implementations?
|
||||
|
||||
**YES** - Significant redundancies identified:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Data Connection Redundancies:
|
||||
- ✗ **Multiple WebSocket connections** to same exchanges (Binance, etc.)
|
||||
- ✗ **Duplicate order book processing** across components
|
||||
- ✗ **Multiple COBIntegration instances** instead of shared service
|
||||
- ✗ **Redundant memory usage** for order book caches
|
||||
|
||||
#### Processing Redundancies:
|
||||
- ✗ Same market data consolidated multiple times
|
||||
- ✗ Duplicate price bucket calculations
|
||||
- ✗ Multiple exchange breakdown computations
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Combined Launch Script Status
|
||||
|
||||
**AVAILABLE** - Multiple options exist:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Existing Scripts:
|
||||
1. **`run_integrated_rl_cob_dashboard.py`** ✅
|
||||
- Combines RL trader + Dashboard in single process
|
||||
- Integrated prediction display
|
||||
- Shared COB data source (optimal)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Separate Scripts** (redundant):
|
||||
- `run_cob_dashboard.py`
|
||||
- `run_realtime_rl_cob_trader.py`
|
||||
- `run_enhanced_cob_training.py`
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Launch Configuration Updates
|
||||
|
||||
**COMPLETED** - Added to `.vscode/launch.json`:
|
||||
|
||||
#### New Configurations:
|
||||
1. **🚀 Integrated COB Dashboard + RL Trading**
|
||||
- Single process with shared COB data
|
||||
- Optimal resource usage
|
||||
- Program: `run_integrated_rl_cob_dashboard.py`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **🔥 COB Dashboard + 1B RL Trading System** (Compound)
|
||||
- Runs dashboard and RL trader separately
|
||||
- Higher resource usage but better isolation
|
||||
- Configurations: Dashboard + RL Trader
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions:
|
||||
1. **Use Integrated Script** - `run_integrated_rl_cob_dashboard.py` for optimal efficiency
|
||||
2. **Launch via**: `🚀 Integrated COB Dashboard + RL Trading` configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Improvements (Future):
|
||||
1. **Shared COB Service** - Single COBIntegration instance as shared service
|
||||
2. **Message Bus** - Distribute COB updates via event system
|
||||
3. **Resource Pooling** - Share WebSocket connections and order book caches
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage Guide
|
||||
|
||||
### Launch Options (Ordered by Efficiency):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **🚀 Integrated COB Dashboard + RL Trading** (RECOMMENDED)
|
||||
- Single process, shared resources
|
||||
- Real-time RL predictions in dashboard
|
||||
- Optimal memory usage
|
||||
|
||||
2. **🔥 COB Dashboard + 1B RL Trading System** (Compound)
|
||||
- Separate processes for isolation
|
||||
- Higher resource usage
|
||||
- Better for debugging individual components
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Individual Scripts** (Development only)
|
||||
- Separate dashboard or RL trader
|
||||
- Highest resource usage
|
||||
- Use only for component-specific debugging
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Details
|
||||
|
||||
### COB Data Flow:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Exchange APIs → WebSocket Streams → MultiExchangeCOBProvider
|
||||
↓
|
||||
COBIntegration (callbacks & feature extraction)
|
||||
↓
|
||||
├── Dashboard (real-time visualization)
|
||||
├── RL Models (1B parameter training)
|
||||
└── Trading Executor (signal execution)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Memory Usage Comparison:
|
||||
- **Integrated**: ~4GB (shared COB data)
|
||||
- **Compound**: ~6-8GB (duplicate COB instances)
|
||||
- **Separate**: ~2-3GB each (multiple duplications)
|
||||
|
||||
### Current COB Features:
|
||||
- ✅ Multi-exchange aggregation (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, etc.)
|
||||
- ✅ Real-time order book consolidation
|
||||
- ✅ Fine-grain price buckets ($10 BTC, $1 ETH)
|
||||
- ✅ CNN/DQN feature generation
|
||||
- ✅ Session Volume Profile (SVP)
|
||||
- ✅ Market microstructure analysis
|
||||
- ✅ Dashboard integration with WebSocket streaming
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
The COB system is well-architected with a solid data source (`MultiExchangeCOBProvider`), but current implementations create redundant instances. The **integrated script** (`run_integrated_rl_cob_dashboard.py`) already solves this by sharing COB data between dashboard and RL training, and has been added to launch configurations for easy access.
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Usage**: Use `🚀 Integrated COB Dashboard + RL Trading` launch configuration for optimal resource utilization and functionality.
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user